Dick and... Jane?

A picture of Dick Cheney on the White House website has convinced people that he was fooling around with a naked woman. Some saw her reflection in his sunglasses. Turns out it was just his hand on a fishing pole-- he was fly fishing. Check out the article in the LA Times. The comments are my favorite part. Here are a few:

• HEY, sometimes a bare hand DOES resemble a naked lady. [David]
  
• What naked lady in her right mind would get near him? Definitely his own hand. An old friend. hehe [mangowild]
• That's it! That's a mans hand in those glasses! I knew Cheney was gay. ;) [captainkona]
  
• It's perfectly obvious it's a reflection of his hand .... what is does reveal is apparently poor technique. The way his thumb is wrapped around the grip, it looks like he is choking it to death. Torturing it, even. On the plus side, woeful technique = safe (non-renditioned) trout. [Evilscribbler]
  
• If thats a naked woman..that probably isn't a fishing pole he's holding! [trshaw]
  
• Is that a zit on his nose reflected in his right lens, or do I see a nipple? [John]
  
• It's clearly a baby's arm holding an apple. So, the question arises, who is THAT? [lexicon ]
  
• Dick Cheney hasn't been that close to a naked woman in 40 years. [JC]
  
• Looks more like one of those high tech battery operated whips to me [Carlos Solis]
  

If there were 10, it could be a Letterman top ten list.

Barrons Blog

Apple's stock movement next week will depend on industry earnings reported (Intel on the 15th, IBM & Ebay on the 16th, Google on the 17th). If tech industry goes down, so does Apple. However, Intel could surprise and boost up the market. Also, Apple's Q2 earnings could be good, and investors could forgive the company's typically conservative estimates and bring the stock to 160 after earnings. If the Fed drops the funds rate another 50 bps, we could see another jump up at the end of the month. My guess is 165 or 170 if we're lucky. But that's a lot of ifs, and there are a lot of realistic comments in this thread, such as-- GE and UPS earnings scared people; AAPL could be at the top of a downward spiral, a la MOT; market failed 4th try to overcome resistance; CFO sold; advertisements galore; scarcity of iPhones means AAPL doesn't want to have excess inventory in a recession; what goes up on no news goes down on no news; tech's weak season; AAPL was only up due to 3G rumors-- all of these points make me want sell at a loss just to get out. I saw my money evaporate in a few days in January. I held calls that became worthless. Better safe than sorry. We'll see what next week brings.

Sources:
1. Apple Shares Sliding On Little News

Posted to Barron blog.

 

Apple: Getting Ready For March Quarter Earnings

One final note: AT&T (T) reports earnings one day before Apple; you will want to pay attention to anything they say on iPhone unit sales.

Projections

Last week Alcoa and UPS announced earnings that fell below analyst expectations and GE posted a decline in earnings. AMD announced layoffs and poor sales, and the S&P slipped to 1332.83.

However, for all the bad news, I believe there is still potential in technology. Alcoa, AMD, and UPS are not good measures for tech (although the case can be made for UPS deliveries of online purchases). Two weeks ago Oracle missed but RIMM beat profit expectations by nearly 15%, setting the tone for choppy Q1 earnings. I think we'll see a lot of up and down in this market, but overall, I hope (and here's where I worry) that AAPL will continue to be positive. I worry about hoping because I know that it's the worst thing to do in a market.

But I don't believe we will really know the effect broad-based earnings declines have on technology in general until Intel reports on the 15th, followed by IBM and Ebay on the 16th, and Google on the 17th. Only then can we really see where Apple will go.

It looks like if Apple does better than expected, but still warns for Q3, it may hold at 160 after earnings, but I don't expect to see a jump of more than 5% of whatever it is before earnings, mostly likely 145-150, if it compares to RIMM's price action after earnings. If next week is bad, I expect Apple to hold at 145 or so, but that may be wishful thinking. It could go below 140. Still, after options expiration on Friday, it could start going up again as traders place earnings bets, and even if it doesn't have much action after earnings, the Fed will most likely cut 50 bps at the end of the month and provide a boost to the market. I expect AAPL could reach 170 if we're lucky, or at least 165. So May calls are good if you can stomach the risk. However, give yourself the extra month and go into July.

I expect Intel to surprise us with good earnings, countering the AMD disappointment. I don't think we've seen the last of the good news in tech, although you should take you r profits for the summer soon after it happens. Buy back in September.

The opinions above are my own, based on Yahoo news, charts, and Bloomberg. Please do your own research.

Sources:
1. Bloomberg: U.S. Stocks Drop After General Electric's Surprise Profit Miss
2. Earnings.com: IBM
3. Earnings.com: INTC
4. Earnings.com: GOOG
5. Earnings.com: EBAY
6. Earnings.com: AAPL
7. Bloomberg: European Stocks Fall; STMicroelectronics, TomTom, Barratt Drop
8. U.S. Stocks Gain, Led by Retailers, Technology; Wal-Mart Rises
9. Research In Motion Gains as Forecasts Top Estimates (Update5)
10. SAP Shares Decline as Oracle Sales Miss Estimates (Update1)

Posted to Yahoo! AAPL message board.

Poole retires, Bullard on board

St. Louis Fed Names Bullard to Succeed Retiring Poole (Update2)

Bullard's published research indicates that he, like Poole and Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, espouses a numeric inflation goal. A research paper that Bullard co-wrote last year said that ``independent central banks will set low positive inflation targets in economies that possess highly developed financial markets.''

In a research paper titled ``A Model of Near-Rational Exuberance,'' written in March 2007, and revised in January, Bullard and his co-authors said that too much reliance by economists and central bankers on their own judgment has drawbacks.

Drawbacks, yes-- namely, they can't stop relying on their own judgment. If they did, the Fed wouldn't have bowed to market pressures and lowered rates, setting the stage for the impending CPI bubble and the hyperinflation that will follow.

Where Is the Next Bubble?

The next bubble: Priming the markets for tomorrow's big crash

Trimming the Investment Firms

Last week, the Times had a great article explaining the credit mess to the layperson:
Can’t Grasp Credit Crisis? Join the Club

Today it came out with another good article:
What Created This Monster?

I thought a hedge fund would collapse-- I didn't know an investment firm would.

I disagree with the first article that the crisis has been going on for 7 months (which would mean it started in September)-- I think it started in August with the first big dip in the market.

More news that the crisis is spreading into other areas of credit:
CIT Taps Credit Lines and Talks of Asset Sales

Time to short Visa?
Visa Has a $45 Billion Debut on Wall St.

The trend for IPOs these days is to start them off big, then bleed them [investors] dry:
The Blackstone Group

(Which I always confuse with Blackrock, Inc, which is on the good side of this equation.)

Reminds me of the end of the tech boom.

NYT: Soldiering On, but Somber...

Hillary isn't as confident anymore.

Finbar Taggit

Yahoo Finance Tech Ticker had a video on Finbar Taggit, a hedge fund blogger that anonymously corrects incorrect stories in the press about hedge funds. See the video above, or the link for the story.

Some buzzwords:

• Rebates
• Performance fee
• Large ticket
• Lock ups
• Side letters
• Side pockets
• Seed capital-- $40MM used to be enough for investors from Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, but now they want to see at least $100MM in your startup fund before recommending you. The average investor won't invest in a hedge fund unless it has at least $125MM in it. As he says, the days of starting a hedge fund with just a laptop are over.
• Risk/Reward criteria
• Market neutral

He says that contrary to popular belief, the credit crunch that started in August of last year was not due to hedge funds, but caught most of them in the muck with the rest of us. Now hedge funds are not finding many investors due to the "safety issue" of cautious investors, scared of the markets.